Is anyone else as disturbed as I am by the story that Lance Armstrong's urine samples from the 1999 Tour de France have tested positive for performance enhancing drugs? Seriously, six-year-old urine. That's just nasty!
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8345157d569e200d83453d70453ef
Links to weblogs that reference Lance Armstrong & Doping ... Again:
1. Posted by Joshua Wright on August 24, 2005 @ 14:33 | Permalink
What I found most curious about this story was that the lab that conducted the tests could not match the (yuck) 6 year old urine samples to the athletes because the tests were run anonymously, but L'Equippe was mysteriously able to do so. I am very skeptical.
2. Posted by Phil on October 31, 2005 @ 5:07 | Permalink
Do you know then the urine of lance for the 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 years are still not tested ?
So in the future its not a mistery, this guy is really an lyer and you an, you know the people who like to hear amazing stories
3. Posted by Phil on October 31, 2005 @ 5:08 | Permalink
Do you know then the urine of lance for the 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 years are still not tested ?
So in the future its not a mistery, this guy is really an lyer and you an, you know the people who like to hear amazing stories
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |||
| 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
| 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 |
| 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 |
| 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
