September 27, 2005
"A pit bull in size 6 shoes"
Posted by Gordon Smith

Miers

That was then-Governor George Bush talking about the then-chair of the Texas Lottery Commission, Harriet Miers. Today, rumors surfaced that Bush is considering Miers as a possible replacement for Sandra Day O'Connor. Miers currently is serving as White House Counsel, and she has two attributes other than her gender that make her an appealing candidate. First, she is a longtime and loyal confidant of the President. At one time, Miers was Bush's private lawyer, and this profile in WaPo, quoting her former law partner in Dallas, suggests that she had the right stuff:

"The thing that comes to mind when I think of Harriet is that she basically puts her clients' interests ahead of everything, including her own personal life, sleeping hours and all those things. She is defined by hard work, dedication and client loyalty."

While it is often said that President Bush values loyalty above all else, there is something else that would be attractive about a Miers appointment that may be equally important to the President: no judicial record. If she is nominated, we can expect an intense search for clues about her positions on abortion rights and ... well, abortion rights. But she looks like someone who has spent most of her career representing others' views, not proclaiming her own. This may make her difficult to oppose, but it also makes her performance on the Court difficult to predict.

P.S. Perhaps the most remarkable thing that I found about Harriet Miers: not only does she merit an entry in Wikipedia, but it is already updated to account for the rumor! Do you think she is updating that article herself?

Supreme Court | Bookmark

TrackBacks (0)

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8345157d569e200d83459991853ef

Links to weblogs that reference "A pit bull in size 6 shoes":

Comments (8)

1. Posted by Matt Bodie on October 3, 2005 @ 5:20 | Permalink

I heard it here first.


2. Posted by JAMES C. BERBIGLIA on October 3, 2005 @ 15:56 | Permalink

As a Democrat I suggest we take this one and show the country that we can compromise, unite on issues with Republican moderates, etc. Harriet Meirs cannot be beaten, so why lose points with the public when we could look good and maybe even gain some status by voting with what will be an even larger margin of victory than Roberts.


3. Posted by Alex on October 3, 2005 @ 17:26 | Permalink

Depends. I agree completely in theory...but since we do not know anything about her, who is to say she isnt going to be Bush's puppet for the next god knows how long?


4. Posted by Chris on October 3, 2005 @ 18:12 | Permalink

Haven't we had enough with unqualified appointees? Think of the unqualified Micheal Brown who recently left FEMA due to his inadequate response during Hurricane Katrina. Do you suppose Harriet Miers might do the same if she completely messes up? Unlikely.

There are crucial differences between the role of a lawyer and a judge. Laywers are centered on debating the point for their client while a judge's duty is to level-headed interpretation of the law. Miers has only had experience arguing for her client.

I am a little more than concerned that given Harriet Miers' personal and professional ties to Bush, she may feel obligated to slant rulings toward the person and party that put her there. This selection does not bode well, in my humble opinion.


5. Posted by Grace on October 4, 2005 @ 14:52 | Permalink

I would dearly love to know her personal feelings on Roe v. Wade, but what I'd rather know is how seriously she takes the Constitution of the United States of America. Once she is a U.S.Supreme court judge, she no longer has to reflect anyones opinions but her own, least of all the President elect. Don't forget, she cannot be fired! If she regards the Constitution as sacrosanct I believe she will be fine once she settles in. I truly hope this is the case.


6. Posted by helen on October 10, 2005 @ 19:44 | Permalink

and more critisisms 'boot her, where are they? i mean, it's due tomorrow and i'm starting now and i can't find critisisms???
crexy!


7. Posted by Paul on October 12, 2005 @ 8:36 | Permalink

I can't believe all of the positive comments here. Ms. Miers is clearly at best marginally qualified. Nowhere is it recorded that she is anything like a Constitutional scholar. In my opinion she is another Bush crony like former FEMA Director Brown and others in the administration. Her recently revealed writings read like love letters to Bush. Does he think that she is the next most qualified after John Roberts? I hope not! Perhaps we Democrats should sit aside and let the Republicans tear her and each other apart.


8. Posted by Bill lowe on October 24, 2005 @ 11:22 | Permalink

The President is displaying his usual arrogance and contempt for what other smarter, brighter, more reflective , and knowledgeable people think. I think his personality consists of his feeling of God given right, by the silver spoon he inherited and never earned, coupled with a low intelligences and lack of critical thinking skills. His appointment of Harriet Mires is an insult to all American Citizens and the Supreme Court. Her primary qualifications are thinking Bush is God. Anyone that thinks he is brilliant says a lot about his or her intellect & ability. If she is confirmed than it shows, we have elected a bunch of idiots to the Senate, which I think is highly likely. But in spite of the lack of any qualifications for the Supreme court she is probably a decent person and has many more qualifications for that job then George Bush has for President! From just viewing his policies without any knowledge of the one responsible, I think most would decide we had a Left Wing Liberal Democrat in office! His out of control spending & deficits, pork barrel lading projects, cronyism and the sheer stupidity & incompetence of lack of any foresight in managing Iraq after the conquest was total complete incompetence by him and his advisors. His discovery after 5 years in office and 4 years after 9/11 that we have a serious Illegal Alien invasion with millions of poorly educate people pouring across our open borders is beyond belief. His brilliant solutions to the problem is just make then legal than we won’t have and Illegal Alien problem,. Shows he has no concept of what problems will be caused by having millions more poorly educated prolific breeders with a 50% high school drop out rate, will have on this country or the billions in cost for their benefit’s, the crime & the lowing of our standard of living & erosion of the Middle class! It also shows a disrespect for Laws & the Rule of Law, as he proved again with the Meirs nomination to the Supreme Court! While I feel sorry for Meirs that was threw into a situation and position she is clearly not qualified by a stupid President with a King George Complex, that feeling does not extend to the President! I am one of his many ex-supporters that feel betrayed by this President and think if Republicans do not disown him and his policies it will set Republicans back years! They will have a hard time being taken seriously again as having the ability for an honest, smaller, effective government for the American people!

Post a comment

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In

Bloggers
Papers
Posts
Recent Comments
Popular Threads
Search The Glom
The Glom on Twitter
Archives by Topic
Archives by Date
February 2012
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29      
Syndicate The Glom
Subscribe

The Glom's Blog Network on Facebook:

Miscellaneous Links
LexisNexis Top Business Blogs 2011

 LexisNexis Tax Law Community 2011 Top 20 Blogs