This small story seems to have gotten lost both in the more exciting news of the nation (Katrina, Roberts, etc.) and the more exciting news about Oracle's acquisition. On Monday, Larry Ellison agreed to settle a derivative suit brought by Oracle shareholders over a $900 million stock sale that Ellison executed in 2001 before poor earnings were released and Oracle shares plunged 52%. The case is interesting for two reasons. First, Ellison is agreeing to pay $100 million to charity, not to the corporation. The payments will be made in Oracle's name, and it is unclear who will take the deduction. Second, the facts of this suit were the subject of a suit brought and lost by shareholders in Delaware. The hard copy article in Monday's NYT speculated that the more pro-investor state insider trading laws in California could result in treble damages (gain of $400 million times three), so rolling the dice would have been imprudent even for an innocent man with the wherewithal to pay $100 million. SF Chronicle story here.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8345157d569e200d8342443c953ef
Links to weblogs that reference Larry Ellison Settles California Insider Trading Case:
- geoff on Co-ops to th
- J. Scott on Textbooks fo
- rh on The Vistapri
- Matt Chandler on Scenes From
- Ariella on Wisconsin's
- Jake on The Wisconsi
- Jake on Another Look
- Jake on Another Look
- Jake on Generation F
- Gordon Smith on Are Banks (s
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |||
| 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
| 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 |
| 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 |
| 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |






