Apparently, the blogosphere (and the Glom) appear to be "all Miers, all the time," but if even I weren't already convinced that Miers is not the most qualified candidate for SCOTUS, this item from David Frum (National Review) is really, really scary.
Tip: Randy Barnett.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8345157d569e200d834909ce269e2
Links to weblogs that reference Scariest Miers Item so Far:
1. Posted by Doug Hoffer on October 11, 2005 @ 10:52 | Permalink
I think what is most troublesome is that almost all bad news about Miers seems entirely plausible. Not having a record of achievement or paper trail that other candidates have, its hard to tell what information concerning her is and is not credible.
2. Posted by Gordon Smith on October 11, 2005 @ 14:24 | Permalink
Hi Doug. David Frum is a credible person, and I believe him when he reports on his conversations with people in DC. He wrote that there would be several "surprises" this week, so I am waiting for those to unfold. If he is right, and we start getting negative information about Miers, I think her candidacy could evaporate rather quickly. If she makes it through the hearing without a withdrawal, I suspect she will be confirmed. But that's just a guess.
3. Posted by Doug Hoffer on October 11, 2005 @ 15:48 | Permalink
I suppose its difficult to be vetted properly when you're the one in charge of vetting.
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |||
| 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
| 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 |
| 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 |
| 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
