Last week INSITE sponsored a talk by Mary Zellmer-Bruhn, who is an Assistant Professor in the Strategic Management and Organization Department of the Carlson School of Management at the University of Minnesota. She is working with colleagues there on issues relating to the formation of entrepreneurial teams. For example, they have written a paper entitled "Entrepreneurial Team Formation: An Exploration of New Member Addition" that examines various theories about new member addition. They ask: why do entrepreneurial teams choose particular new members? Perhaps because they seek to assemble certain resources (e.g., human or social capital) that will increase the likelihood of team success. Perhaps because of interpersonal attraction or the desire to make a social connection. Or perhaps some combination of motivations. Zellmer-Bruhn and her colleagues have been interviewing entrepreneurs in search of answers, but retrospective accounts are pretty muddled. Their current work attempts to identify entrepreneurs at an earlier stage, thus enabling prospective work.
Understanding teams is a burgeoning area of entrepreneurship research, inspired by the recognition that the "heroic entrepreneur" is largely mythical. Practically speaking, all successful entrepreneurs work in teams. It seems to me that this fact holds some potential interest for legal scholars. The structure of an entrepreneurial team must be influenced by available legal forms. Consider this:
Henry Ford has an idea for a car. The Dodge brothers have a machine shop. They want to form a relationship. What are the options?
Notice that your answer to that question likely involves a list of legal relationships: partners; employer-employee; principal-independent contractor; shareholders; joint venturers; etc. We could abolish all of these forms and allow people to create relationships from scratch, but it wouldn't take long before patterns started to emerge. At some point, we would give names to the patterns, and voila! We would have legal forms again. As a result, I assume that law must have something interesting to say about the composition and structure of entrepreneurial teams. (Or not. Maybe law just reduces the transaction costs of contracting and doesn't affect the shape of teams at all.)
I wonder: does the menu of legal forms vary enough from one country to the next that we might think of some countries as being superior to others in their ability to encourage entrepreneurial team formation?
UPDATE: Extra credit for the person who can identify all three people in the photo above. Click the photo for a bigger view. (By the way, are they a team?)
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Links to weblogs that reference Entrepreneurial Teams:
1. Posted by Pranay Kapadia on December 14, 2005 @ 21:26 | Permalink
Gordon - try saving the image, it gives away the answer!
2. Posted by Gordon Smith on December 14, 2005 @ 23:52 | Permalink
Pranay, I figured people would get the Google connection, but do you know the middle guy?
3. Posted by Gordon Smith on December 15, 2005 @ 0:04 | Permalink
Crud! I just realized that they have nametags! (You can't see them in the small photo.) Ok, it isn't a very good quiz. Here is the answer for those who are slow:
Sergey Brin (Google)
John Doerr (VC from Kleiner Perkins)
Larry Page (Google)
4. Posted by Mike Madison on December 15, 2005 @ 8:22 | Permalink
The resulting patterns might be legal forms, but they need not be, particularly since the patterns need not be (and in fact often will not be) purely bilateral. As teams, colloquially speaking, usually are not.
Also, a propos of:
"I wonder: does the menu of legal forms vary enough from one country to the next that we might think of some countries as being superior to others in their ability to encourage entrepreneurial team formation?"
You can substitute "city/cities" or "region/regions" for "country/countries" in that sentence and have two equally interesting questions.
5. Posted by Moncler Salg on March 5, 2012 @ 8:04 | Permalink
I recently came across your blog and have been reading along. I thought I would leave my first comment. I don't know what to say except that I have enjoyed reading. Nice blog. I will keep visiting this blog very often.