Not many details at this point, but the WSJ is reporting that Frank Quattrone's convinction has been overturned on appeal by the Second Circuit due to an erroneous jury instruction. The jury instruction in question seems to be related to mens rea required of Quattrone ("corrupt intent"), similar to the jury instruction that was at issue in the Arthur Andersen Supreme Court case, which reversed AA's conviction. Quattrone was charged with obstruction after sending an email to employees of CSFB reminding them of a document retention policy at the time that the company was being questioned regarding IPO spinning. Quattrone was never charged with illegally spinning or breaking any other NASD or SEC rule. More news as it becomes available.
UPDATE: The WSJ has just linked to the Second Circuit opinion here.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8345157d569e200d834b1eba269e2
Links to weblogs that reference Quattrone Gets New Trial:
1. Posted by KipEsquire on March 20, 2006 @ 13:15 | Permalink
Pretty embarrassing for the WSJ to misspell "Arthur Andersen."
2. Posted by KipEsquire on March 20, 2006 @ 13:19 | Permalink
Hey, actually the Second Circuit did too, repeatedly.
3. Posted by Andrew on April 18, 2006 @ 7:59 | Permalink
hi manGeneric Cialishow
Buy Hydrocodone Onlineare
Generic Levitrayou?
- Frank Pasquale on Is the Death
- Fred Tung on Is "Free" th
- Evolution Media on Is "Free" th
- Dave Hoffman on Is the Death
- Rebecca on Mixed Signal
- D Hamilton on So Now Profi
- Mate on Nutelleria
- Jake on Goodbye blaw
- Joe on Goodbye blaw
- Anon on SpongeBob at
Or get posts from The Glom on
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |||
| 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
| 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 |
| 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 |
| 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
