The W$J has an interesting article about IPO companies with lots of debt:
So far this year, one-third of the 64 initial public offerings issued warnings in their prospectuses about the risks associated with their debt levels.... Twenty percent carried net tangible book-value deficits even after raising money through their IPOs, meaning that, if those companies were liquidated the day they came public, stockholders would receive nothing.
Is debt a bad thing? We are still having the same debate about debt that was raging in the late 1980s: debt-as-burden v. debt-as-discipline. This is a silly debate in the abstract because getting the right amount of debt is the trick. Easier said than done.
One argument that is -- hmm, how to say this diplomatically? -- not helpful comes from John Coyle, head of J.P. Morgan's financial-sponsors group: "As a company deleverages, it adds to its earnings capacity. So in a way, investors in these IPOs know there is some future earnings growth that is already in the bag -- as the leverage comes down, earnings will go up."
This might be an interesting insight in Accounting 101, but it doesn't tell us anything useful about the highly leveraged companies that are hitting the public markets. The notion that "future earnings growth ... is already in the bag" brushes aside the main concern about high levels of indebtedness: uncertainty over future earnings. A slight downturn, either for the highly leveraged company or its industry, can place substantial constraints on the highly leveraged company's ability to operate.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Links to weblogs that reference Debt-heavy IPOs:
1. Posted by Fred Tung on May 15, 2006 @ 12:29 | Permalink
There is an interesting piece in the Economist's April 20 print edition--which you can access as a premium subscriber at: http://www.economist.com/displaystory.cfm?story_id=E1_GRPSTPS.
The piece is entitled, fittingly enough, Leveraged Debt: Going Naked. It illustrates just how cheap debt is these days with its description of the recent trend of covenant-free bank debt at very low spreads. The story cites the buyout of Neiman's last October, led by private equity firms Texas Pacific and Warburg Pincus. $2 BB of the $5.1BB buyout price was in bank debt. Almost no covenants. In April, Dole Foods borrowed $750 MM in bank debt for 175 basis points over LIBOR. Some debt limits but no financial covenants.
This helps explain all the debt, but not why the IPO market isn't worried.
2. Posted by Replica Hermes Handbag on November 20, 2011 @ 3:30 | Permalink
I'd be interested in hearing. The TOS seems rather clear that it is not unless expressly approved by Amazon. I guess if the library got it in writing then they would be ok.