California is threatening to overtake Wisconsin in cheese production. According to the NYT:
Wisconsin boasts the nation’s only "Master Cheesemaker" certification, for its most accomplished veteran makers (there were 47 as of April) and one of the earliest cheese-making education programs, at the University of Wisconsin.
But in recent decades, California began expanding its milk and cheese production at an astonishing pace. Signs of the growth began popping up all around: 21 awards to California cheeses in the prestigious American Cheese Society competition in 2002, for example, and a $21-million-a-year national advertising blitz starring talking “Happy Cows” from California, including images of a seemingly miserable cow making a break from a snowy, blustery field for sunnier pastures out West and the slogan, "Great cheese comes from happy cows."
The commercials were even broadcast on television stations in Wisconsin, a fact that some cheese makers here considered an audacious (and not particularly Midwestern) act of aggression, and one that led several of them to question whisperingly just how "happy" the cows in California really could be, considering the heat wave this summer that killed tens of thousands of them.
Yeah, that "happy cows" business was a crock. Anyway, in anticipation of the inevitable, Wisconsin is ceding the quantity crown to California and turning to greener pastures. This is Wisconsin's equivalent of "you can't fire me because I quit":
[C]heese makers say they are turning their focus to high-priced specialty, artisan and organic cheeses that take more time to produce, cheeses like Asiago, feta and blue cheese, and those with names newly dreamed up.
"We’re moving on from this whole quantity thing," said Jeanne Carpenter of the state’s Dairy Business Innovation Center, who said specialty cheeses now accounted for 15 percent of the state’s production, up significantly from five years ago. “Where Wisconsin is going to make its mark now is in the quality of the cheese."
I love that line: "We’re moving on from this whole quantity thing." Take that, California!
For those of us who both love cheese and study business organizations (and I expect that there is a high degree of overlap in those groups), the most interesting development from this competition is the development of the "LLC Cooperative," a new form of business organization embraced by five states to date: Wyoming, Minnesota, Iowa and Tennessee, and Wisconsin. Even the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws has gotten into the act. NCCUSL is drafting a uniform cooperative statute, which should be available next summer.
Normally, cooperatives are owned by patrons, but an LLC Cooperative allows for outside investment by providing for two classes of equity investors, "patron members" and "investor members." The entity is treated as a partnership for tax purposes, and as explained by this slightly dated but interesting study, it is already being used by many innovative companies outside of agriculture.
Thanks to Anuj Desai for flagging the NYT article for me.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/38673/6231313
Links to weblogs that reference Cheese Innovations:
1. Posted by D. Daniel Sokol on September 30, 2006 @ 15:00 | Permalink
As a strategy, this makes sense for WI as CA overtakes it in terms of scale efficiencies. A nice explanation of the competitive situation between CA and WI dairies can be found in the factual summary of Dean Foods Co. v. Tracy, 990 F. Supp. 646 (1997).
I would note that the competition for quality cheeses in the US comes primarily not from other US states but from abroad. In this sense, US protectionism helps to shield US cheese makers from competition. End consumers like Gordon and Anuj get hit with a higher bill as a consequence. Looking in the USDA agriculture tariff database, I found that the average bound tariff rate for cheese imports to the United States is 36.4.
Into my second year of living in Madison, I have not been particularly impressed by the quality of high end WI cheeses when compared to European and other cheese makers. Over time this can change. The success of high end CA wine vis-à-vis traditional European wineries is a classic example.
2. Posted by arthur on September 30, 2006 @ 19:10 | Permalink
Blessed be the cheesemakers . . .
3. Posted by Jake on October 1, 2006 @ 15:23 | Permalink
California can have the mantle for quantity of cheese production. Wisconsin, second only to Minnesota, will always remain superior in terms of producing quality cheese.
- dissertations on Lance's New
- fedgovernor on The Oil Mark
- Jake on The Oil Mark
- Cathy on The Oil Mark
- laborprof lpb on Bailout, Uni
- fedgovernor on The Oil Mark
- Brandon P. on BYU v. Utah
- David on What makes a
- Cathy on The Oil Mark
- Vic on Fleischer 1,
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
| 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
| 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 |
| 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 |
| 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |






