January 22, 2007
Fulbright & Jaworski to Offer Back-Up Child Care and Elder Care for Employees
Posted by Christine Hurt

An attorney-mom friend of mine emailed me an article in the Austin Business Journal reporting that Fulbright & Jaworski LLP announced this month that the firm will offer its employees 80 hours annually of in-home or out-of-town care for children or seniors.  This policy will also allow employees to travel with nursing children and have care provided in the visited city.  The F&J announcement is here.  The firm portrays this program as both pro-family and pro-client, as "client needs do not stop when relatives are sick."  This makes sense -- everyone loses when an attorney stays at home with a child too sick to go to day care or school (but otherwise healthy), the firm loses billable hours, the client loses accessibility and productivity, and the attorney loses peace of mind and more.

Last week, the WSJ had an article on the high costs and low supply of back-up child care.  (Here are some comments that showed up on the WSJ blog about the article.)  When our first child was born, we chose a nanny because without family nearby, we knew we had no back-up plan if our sick child couldn't go to daycare.  In the first month, our nanny threw her back out, leaving us without a back-up plan!  We called a back-up provider, but they couldn't send someone for the first day, so (I'm not kidding) the mother of a friend of ours kept our infant.  Teaching law school is definitely more flexible than practicing law, but I have to admit that once during a preschool holiday, my friend and Marquette colleague Andrea Schneider kept 2-year-old Luke occupied at her computer while I taught my 50 minute class.  (My husband's suggestion was to use the health club's in-house childcare while he went to a hearing in the courthouse next door.  CPS?)  So, back-up child care can be quite a key commodity.

And large employers are definitely lower-cost providers of these services than individuals who have no idea when or how often these needs will arise.  Retaining services for a pool seems to be the most efficient avenue for everyone concerned.

Gender Issues | Bookmark

TrackBacks (0)

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8345157d569e200d83510cd4069e2

Links to weblogs that reference Fulbright & Jaworski to Offer Back-Up Child Care and Elder Care for Employees:

Comments (5)

1. Posted by Lisa Fairfax on January 22, 2007 @ 15:25 | Permalink

An interesting development. The firm in which I worked had back-up child care and I think it was a great idea. In fact, the firm debated whether or not to convert the back-up center to a full center and rejected the idea. This was because having a full center would mean that there would be a long waitlist and most people would not be allowed to utilize it, while having a back-up center would provide a much-needed emergency service for almost everyone in the firm. And anecdotally, there were many people who claimed that they selected the firm because of the back-up center (not just the fact that it was available, but also the fact that the firm thought it was important enough to make it available).


2. Posted by William Henderson on January 22, 2007 @ 17:53 | Permalink

Christine, This is an interesting development. I know one law professor who, while an appellate law clerk, took her new born to work with her on a daily basis. She did not ask the judge--she just did it. She told me that if she did ask the judge, he would have said no.

Being an appellate clerk is perhaps the best job for bringing your child to work; all you do on most days is read and write at your desk. But I thought her choice to just show up with the baby shifted the burden in interesting ways--kind of like possession is 90% of the what really matter in property law. The judge ended up really warming to the situation.

I always thought this was a interesting self-help anecdote. bh


3. Posted by bill on January 22, 2007 @ 18:16 | Permalink

I wonder how many law schools/universities with law schools actually offer on-campus child care. It seems to me that I've read lots of blogs about whether the importance of blogging, or whether requiring laterals to visit has a differential gender impact -- but lack of on-campus childcare might dwarf those other policies in terms of differential gender impact. That is, if we can generalize from the experience that dads are more likely than moms to use the gym's childcare and then go to the courthouse next door.


4. Posted by Christine on January 22, 2007 @ 20:10 | Permalink

I've worked at three universities that had on-site daycare, and it was full at all three. I never made it off the waiting list at any of them. The day care centers serve students, faculty and staff, and at least at Marquette students had a priority. I have never heard about recruiting someone by guaranteeing them a slot, but it might work!


5. Posted by anon on January 22, 2007 @ 23:38 | Permalink

Is this an indication that the firm is family-friendly or that it wants to eliminate any family-based excuses for you not to be at work? I would have thought with technology the way it is most lawyers could do at least 75% of what they normally do while at home on an occasional day.

Post a comment

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In

Bloggers
Papers
Posts
Recent Comments
Popular Threads
Search The Glom
The Glom on Twitter
Archives by Topic
Archives by Date
February 2012
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29      
Syndicate The Glom
Subscribe

The Glom's Blog Network on Facebook:

Miscellaneous Links
LexisNexis Top Business Blogs 2011

 LexisNexis Tax Law Community 2011 Top 20 Blogs