Aflac Inc has become the first US company to agree to give its shareholders the right to a non-binding vote on executive compensation packages. This "say on pay" policy will become effective in 2009, and was instituted after discussion with shareholders who had submitted a proposal requesting such a policy. Already this year, shareholders have submitted similar advisory "say on pay" policies at some 60 companies. The hope is that other companies will follow Aflac's lead and voluntarily adopt such a policy.
Clearly the "say on pay" is not about disclosure, but rather about ensuring some meaningful dialogue between management and shareholders. While I am not sure if the dialogue itself will lead to "optimal" compensation packages, it does seem like it has the potential to change the way in which compensation decisions are made. The UK has required these kind of advisory votes since 2002 and shareholder activists claim that such votes, and the dialogue that accompanies them, have encouraged companies to tie pay to performance. This at least suggests that having some shareholder input into the compensation process could compel corporations to create compensation packages that do a better job of linking pay to specific performance goals. But I must say that given the seeming inability of other mechanisms to curb the tremendous growth in executive compensation, I am taking the "time will tell" position on this most recent effort.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8345157d569e200d8351b7c9569e2
Links to weblogs that reference Aflac Gives Shareholders a Say on Pay:
1. Posted by KipEsquire on February 22, 2007 @ 16:18 | Permalink
The only shareholders who care about this contrived issue are activist government pension fund managers -- who are usually political appointees and in some cases politicians themselves. This is nothing more than back-door coercive regulation.
If you don't the way the company is run, then sell your shares. Why is this a difficult concept for these bureaucrats?
2. Posted by Jake on February 22, 2007 @ 21:01 | Permalink
Aflac is to be commended. There is no harm in setting up a "say on pay" mechanism for shareholders. And it probably costs only a mere fraction of a corporate jet trip by senior management.
- Anon on SpongeBob at
- Former Customer on Talbots & J.
- Lutz Barz on Jack Welch,
- Jake on Mixed Signal
- ohwilleke on Another Look
- ohwilleke on Co-ops to th
- ohwilleke on Simplicity L
- ohwilleke on Jack Welch,
- Mike on Jack Welch,
- MDF on Refco Attorn
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |||
| 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
| 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 |
| 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 |
| 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |






