March 13, 2007
Do You "Bluebook" Your Submissions?
Posted by Gordon Smith

Bluebook is both a noun and a verb. Bluebooking is something that law review staffs do to law review articles. Having attended the University of Chicago shortly after the creation of the "Maroon Book," my bluebooking skills are impaired. This relieves me of the burden of having Bluebook pet peeves, but the footnotes of my articles always require some tweaking. Does this negatively affect placement?

I don't know the answer to that, but plenty of professors think that pristine footnotes are worth placement points. My view is that less-than-pristine footnotes serve as a sorting device. I want to avoid law review editors who make publication decisions based on the quality of the bluebooking. I want editors who focus on substance.

At least that's what I tell myself to feel better about my footnotes.

Legal Scholarship | Bookmark

TrackBacks (1)

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8345157d569e200d8342fada753ef

Links to weblogs that reference Do You "Bluebook" Your Submissions?:

ยป And While I'm At It... from Legal Profession Blog ...
"...I like Bluebooking. Maybe it's the pure anality of it, like mowing the lawn with a rearbagger (ye ..." [more] (Tracked on March 13, 2007 @ 12:23)
Bloggers
Papers
Posts
Recent Comments
Popular Threads
Search The Glom
The Glom on Twitter
Archives by Topic
Archives by Date
September 2016
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
        1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30  
Miscellaneous Links