April 01, 2007
Reuters and Bloomberg on Blackstone's Tax Structure
Posted by Victor Fleischer

Reuters and Bloomberg have picked up the thread on Blackstone's aggressive tax structure. 

Robert Willens, a highly-respected tax commentator, thinks Blackstone is pretty safe.  From the Bloomberg story:

Robert Willens, an accounting analyst at Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc., said Blackstone may be able to accomplish its goal because the tax code clearly identifies the types of income it can earn under the structure it proposes.         

"If Blackstone earns the type of income specified in the requisite quantities, then that should be the end of the inquiry,'' he said. "It's not proper, in these cases, as a matter of statutory construction, to inquire into whether the `spirit' of the statute has been well served.''         

Mr. Willens may be right that, as a matter of statutory construction, the plain language of 7704 is probably enough to carry the day in court, should the IRS choose to challenge the structure.  This isn't the sort of sham transaction structured that begs for a non-literal interpretation of the Code. 

But that hardly diminishes the tax risk going forward, as Congress isn't bound by its failure to address this kind of structure when it first passed the rules in 1987.  Among other things, the Blackstone structure "works" because it sets up blocker entities that check-the-box as corporations, cleansing the "bad" income from management fees and deal advisory fees.  The check-the-box rules didn't come into effect until 1996, and clearly weren't contemplated when Congress wrote the PTP rules. 

The publicly-traded partnership rules have sprung a leak, and I'd be surprised if Congress didn't try to plug it quickly.  Blackstone's avoidance of the 40 Act and the RIC rules won't help its case.  As Willens notes in the Reuters story, Blackstone is walking a fine line "between acting like an investment company, but not having to register as one."  Congress may find the tight-rope act too clever by half.

Related Posts:  The Politics of Taxing Blackstone, Blackstone IPO: Analysis of the Tax RiskThe Blackstone IPO: Regulatory Arbitrage Extraordinaire

Taxation | Bookmark

TrackBacks (0)

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8345157d569e200d83527fe2769e2

Links to weblogs that reference Reuters and Bloomberg on Blackstone's Tax Structure:

Comments (2)

1. Posted by Jake on April 1, 2007 @ 14:30 | Permalink

Whether Congress acts or not, Blackstone may find that Gregory v. Helvering, Court Holding Co. v. Commissioner, and other tax casebook standbys still lurk in the bushes, awaiting an opportunity to pounce on taxpayers who stretch the Code too far. Pigs get fat, but hogs get slaughtered.


2. Posted by Taxer on March 26, 2008 @ 15:00 | Permalink

I agree with Jake, there is still enough of the grey area here.

Post a comment

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In

Bloggers
Papers
Posts
Recent Comments
Random Walk
Search The Glom
The Glom on Twitter
Archives by Topic
Archives by Date
July 2009
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  
Syndicate The Glom
Subscribe

The Glom's Blog Network on Facebook:

Miscellaneous Links