May 31, 2007
Stoneridge Investment Partners v. Scientific Atlanta
Posted by Gordon Smith

This case -- in which the US Supreme Court will decide whether financial advisors may be liable for "deceptive conduct" under Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act -- has already been attracting a lot of internet buzz. Jay Brown has an interesting post on the (likely) pivotal position of Justice Alito in the outcome. Larry Ribstein agrees on Justice Alito's key role, but "find[s] it hard to believe that Alito would vote to (1) undercut the Central Bank precedent; particularly where (2) that would have the effect of opening a large and ambiguous trap door in securities law liability."

On the merits, this is a tough and interesting issue. The Circuits have split, but if I were a betting man, I would place my money on Ribstein (with the Fifth and Eighth Circuits), rather than Brown (with the Ninth Circuit). But we will watch developments with interest.

Securities | Bookmark

TrackBacks (1)

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8345157d569e200d835807a8969e2

Links to weblogs that reference Stoneridge Investment Partners v. Scientific Atlanta:

» Ted Frank on Stoneridge v. Scientific-Atlanta from ProfessorBainbridge.com ® ...
"In the W$J, Ted explains why this securities fraud case pending before the US Supreme Court is of mo ..." [more] (Tracked on May 31, 2007 @ 12:52)
Comments (1)

1. Posted by Brett McDonnell on May 31, 2007 @ 21:29 | Permalink

With this court, given a choice between the Fifth and the Ninth circuits, one can make a pretty good guess about the result without even knowing anything about the issue.

Post a comment

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In

Bloggers
Papers
Posts
Recent Comments
Popular Threads
Search The Glom
The Glom on Twitter
Archives by Topic
Archives by Date
September 2014
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30        
Miscellaneous Links