January 15, 2008
Stoneridge Opinion Out: 5 to 3 for the Status Quo
Posted by Christine Hurt
I'm running off to a workshop and then to class, but I just received an alert that the Supreme Court's opnion in Stoneridge Investor Partners v. Scientific Atlanta, Inc. has been released. Story here. As expected, the Court has held that the plaintiffs there could not maintain a securities lawsuit against "secondary actors." More later, but here is the opinion.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/38673/25149746
Links to weblogs that reference Stoneridge Opinion Out: 5 to 3 for the Status Quo:
Bloggers
Papers
Posts
Recent Comments
- fedgovernor on The Oil Mark
- Jake on The Oil Mark
- Cathy on The Oil Mark
- laborprof lpb on Bailout, Uni
- fedgovernor on The Oil Mark
- Brandon P. on BYU v. Utah
- David on What makes a
- Cathy on The Oil Mark
- Vic on Fleischer 1,
- Michael on BYU v. Utah
Random Walk
Our del.icio.us 
Search The Glom
The Glom on Twitter
Follow us on 
Archives by Topic
Archives by Date
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
| 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
| 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 |
| 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 |
| 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
Syndicate The Glom
Enter your email address
Miscellaneous Links
