April 19, 2008
The FLDS in Your Neighborhood
Posted by Gordon Smith

Catching up with developments among the FLDS in Texas, I found Guy Murray's roundup of mainstream media stories quite helpful. Also, Anderson Cooper's Blog has lots of interesting details from the hearing yesterday. The latest development is that "Sarah" -- the caller who prompted the raid with allegations of underage marriage -- may be a hoax. (Marleigh Meisner, spokeswoman for Texas Child Protective Services, still maintains that "Sarah" exists.)

So 416 children have been taken from their families by the State of Texas in a raid prompted by what may have been a fabricated telephone call. Last night, watching Larry King in the airport, I heard one of his guests proclaim that the veracity of the initial telephone call was irrelevant given the evidence of sexual abuse that the raid has allegedly uncovered in the FLDS community. And this caused me to wonder: what if someone made a similar call about my neighborhood? Or your neighborhood? Some statistics:

The statistics are shocking

  • 1 in 4 girls is sexually abused before the age of 18.
  • 1 in 6 boys is sexually abused before the age of 18.
  • 1 in 5 children are solicited sexually while on the internet.
  • Nearly 70% of all reported sexual assaults (including assaults on adults) occur to children ages 17 and under.
  • An estimated 39 million survivors of childhood sexual abuse exist in America today.
       Even within the walls of their own homes, children are at risk for sexual abuse
  • 30-40% of victims are abused by a family member.
  • Another 50% are abused by someone outside of the family whom they know and trust.
  • Approximately 40% are abused by older or larger children whom they know.
  • Therefore, only 10% are abused by strangers.

Meisner defends the separation of children from their parents on the ground that abused children are more truthful in interviews about their treatment at home if a parent isn't present.  Based on the foregoing statistics, I would guess that Child Protective Services could use a similar strategy in almost any neighborhood and find evidence of abuse. So I am trying to sort out which is more troubling: evidence of childhood sexual abuse among the FLDS or the tactics of Texas Child Protective Services?

Religion | Bookmark

TrackBacks (0)

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8345157d569e200e5520194f68834

Links to weblogs that reference The FLDS in Your Neighborhood:

Comments (15)

1. Posted by Guy Murray on April 19, 2008 @ 12:31 | Permalink

Gordon,

Thanks for your post on this topic. The stats you reference are troubling. And, your final question even more so. While all child abuse is abhorrent, it is even more so when it is state sponsored, as with the Texas CPS. I am pleased to see your post here, and hope that more Law Profs on their blogs, especially in the Constitutional Law area, will begin discussing these issues.

Regards,

Guy


2. Posted by Cliff on April 19, 2008 @ 16:06 | Permalink

Years ago my then one year old son described this situation perfectly when he looked down at the tray on his high chair after dinner and said "Mess!"


3. Posted by plain truth on April 19, 2008 @ 17:11 | Permalink

At least the FLDS girls haven't taken the LBT (low back tattoo) like your whorish slut women in Texas.

And that Texas TV hog with the bug eyes looks like a slut too.

Now for some real info:

It was legal to marry at 14 year in both texas and utah until recently. In utah, at least, the law was changed with the specific intent of persecuting the FLDS, who are great people, at least the few I have met.

I've often said that i would rather have my daughter(s) become the 10th wife of a good man than the first wife of a feminized white meat pussy.

The only difference between a 14 yo and a fifteen year old is one day. Big deal. It is legal to marry a 15 year old in utah right now.

The real lesson here for you Texas swaggerbitches is that DCFS will soon be coming for your children. "Emotional Abuse" is a term so ambiguous that it can mean whatever the slut manhater social work whore wants in to mean. Do you teach your kids that god loves them. Surely, that is emotional abuse--at least to an athiest bitch.

Do you teach your kids not to intermarry with white people. Now, that is politically incorrect emotional abuse for sure.

I still hope those two hogs (Marleigh Meisner and the homely judge) get brain cancer--me and probably phred phelps are praying for it right now.

Pussy, feminzied white men have lost this country and it started when they let their women become disobedient. Suffer you slime.


4. Posted by DW on April 19, 2008 @ 17:15 | Permalink

Plain Truth,

There is no need for vulgarity.


5. Posted by Christian Prophet on April 19, 2008 @ 18:49 | Permalink

In this case there has been no evidence of abuse, only speculation.

I viewed the video exposing the Texas Foster Care system as drug-riddled horror at:
http://dayofpraise.blogspot.com/

I also read the thousand or so comments from outraged citizens at the petition site:
http://www.thepetitionsite.com/2/free-the-innocent-flds

It seems state bureaucrats have become power mad.


6. Posted by NonVoxPop on April 19, 2008 @ 19:11 | Permalink

Gordon, I may have missed some news: what is it the Texas CPS did that could possibly be worse than sexually abusing children?


7. Posted by Jeremiah on April 20, 2008 @ 12:56 | Permalink

NonVoxPop you have indeed missed some news, as well as the point of this post. Taking children from their innocent parents is an abberation. Abusing children is also disgusting. The problem here is that the state has made a broad, sweeping judgment based on their membership in a particular community rather than assess the danger on a case by case basis. The statistics presented by Mr. Smith demonstrate that each of us would be in danger of a similar application of law if there were incidents of abuse discovered in our school, neighborhood, workplace, church, etc..

According to this article: http://www.cnn.com/2008/CRIME/04/18/polygamy.custody/index.html

Police identified 10 women they believed were either married or pregnant as minors. That’s 10 incidents- or slightly less than 1 in 40 based on the number of children taken into state custody (see Mr. Smiths stats for the rest of the country). The only justification I have seen for such a broad stroke is that the mothers espouse the beliefs of the sect, and they teach their children that to disobey will bring them eternal damnation (Christians, Jews and Muslims beware). That means, in essence, they are guilty for their thoughts, rather than their actions. This is a prima facie case of religious discrimination, and Texas has subverted the law and due process to pursue an unpopular group.

Find the individuals responsible for the actual incidents of abuse, prosecute them to the full extent, and let the rest of these families live in peace.


8. Posted by NonVoxPop on April 20, 2008 @ 22:23 | Permalink

Just to make sure I'm clear on this: separation of children from innocent parents is as bad as sexually abusing children? Is that what you (Gordon and Jeremiah) are proposing?


9. Posted by Gordon Smith on April 20, 2008 @ 22:43 | Permalink

NVP, Stop being silly. You have been commenting here long enough that we all know you aren't this thick. The point is perfectly obvious. We all see now that you don't agree, but don't pretend that we are trying to condone or trivialize sexual abuse.


10. Posted by NonVoxPop on April 21, 2008 @ 11:34 | Permalink

Alright, I’m sorry for being silly. It was the wrong approach to take, and not conducive to real discussion. It did seem to me as though you were trivializing the child sex abuse which occurred, by saying “look, this happens everywhere; Why are we picking on these people?” while ignoring that such abuse is a foundation that FLDS is built on. It’s systematic there, and integral to the perpetuation of their form of polygamy. The same is not true of most American communities. I don’t see a problem with the reasoning that, because this form of polygamy is so foundational and accepted there, all of the members must be complicit in promulgating it, and therefore their children should be taken from them. It would be a religious discrimination issue if the behavior wasn’t criminal for everyone. Making a criminal act a central tenet of one’s religion doesn’t make it less criminal, just more likely that the whole community is involved.

Post a comment

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In

Bloggers
Papers
Posts
Recent Comments
Popular Threads
Search The Glom
The Glom on Twitter
Archives by Topic
Archives by Date
February 2012
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29      
Syndicate The Glom
Subscribe

The Glom's Blog Network on Facebook:

Miscellaneous Links
LexisNexis Top Business Blogs 2011

 LexisNexis Tax Law Community 2011 Top 20 Blogs