We've blogged a bit about CFIUS here - it is the committee process that vets deals for national security implications. The takeaway has been, in part, that this process is becoming an anti-takeover tool that is part of the fabric of the way M&A increasingly works, given that this is a global world, etc. But don't take my word for it. Consider the way this analyst looks a the possibility that EADS might buy the US defense indutry contractor DFS:
"It may that DRS is too big a bite for EADS. The deal is likely to be CFIUS-sensitive and it might be expensive to get over the break-up fee," said JP Morgan analyst Harry Breach.
So that's the idea. CFIUS is like break-up fees. Just part of the process. We've told you about the new regulations under consideration by the committee; here is the Wall Street Journal and Skadden Arps with more.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/38673/29235902
Links to weblogs that reference CFIUS: Administrative Law Meets Deals:
- fedgovernor on The Oil Mark
- Jake on The Oil Mark
- Cathy on The Oil Mark
- laborprof lpb on Bailout, Uni
- fedgovernor on The Oil Mark
- Brandon P. on BYU v. Utah
- David on What makes a
- Cathy on The Oil Mark
- Vic on Fleischer 1,
- Michael on BYU v. Utah
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
| 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
| 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 |
| 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 |
| 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |






