Teaching Corporations was a bit frustrating on Tuesday.
I want my class to internalize the importance of a statute: in practice I remember turning to the D.G.C.L. at least twice a day, but I never really got the importance of the code as a student. The bookstore was late ordering the statutory supplement, but it had finally come in and on Friday I'd told my students that they'd need it for the next assignment. My grand plan for Tuesday's class was for them to flip through code provisions, get confused, and ultimately figure out for themselves how the statutory jigsaw puzzle fit together. Learning by doing, and getting down and dirty with a statute: what better use of class time, right?
Except that it dawned on me 10 minutes into class that most of the 91 students didn't have their statutory supplements with them. I shifted gears eventually into using the document camera to display the code on a projection screen up front, but felt like whole exercise was diluted. I was the one flipping pages, not the students.
Next time I'll tell the class more clearly that they'll need to bring their supplements to class. And I suppose it was a teachable moment for the ones that didn't: you'll need this or you'll be lost.
My father says class is always a bit off the day after a long weekend. Sigh.
| Bookmark
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8345157d569e200e554e0cbf58833
Links to weblogs that reference The dangerous supplement:
1. Posted by Jason Kilborn on September 4, 2008 @ 12:44 | Permalink
I had a similar moment in Bankruptcy the other day, but luckily, our school has not banned either laptops or internet in the classroom. I had earlier pointed out that the Bankruptcy Code (and the DGCL, by the way) was available online for free, so before I even had to say that again, the person on whom I had called and who had just admitted not having his paper supplement (and many others, I am told) had gone to the Code online and was now following dutifully and constructively along with the statute.
Long live laptops and internet access in the classroom!
2. Posted by J.W. Verret on September 4, 2008 @ 13:57 | Permalink
What a great exercise, the DGCL is a good thing to get comfortable with. In some ways equally as important as the cases we spend so much time on.
3. Posted by Jake on September 4, 2008 @ 20:27 | Permalink
Either law school has changed, or law students have changed, or both. There was a time when students, upon hearing from their lawprof that a certain book would be their next assignment, would glue themselves to the nearest copy.
The rather slack class attitude that Prof. Rodriguez describes may correlate with the many newly minted lawyers nowadays who behave like they just finished three years of extended day care.
4. Posted by Steve Bainbridge on September 6, 2008 @ 21:56 | Permalink
Many statutory supplements are now longer than the casebooks they support. Indeed, some could easily be used as weapons in a law school murder mystery. I find that students don't like lugging them to class unless they are positive that the class session will be very heavy on statutes. Of course, there is a solution--namely, to use the one statutory supplement that remains a lean, mean, fighting machine at less than a pound or so. Modesty forbids me from naming names, of course.
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |||
| 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
| 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 |
| 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 |
| 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |





