October 06, 2008
The Short Life of the Short-Selling Ban
Posted by Christine Hurt

With the bailout bill now signed by the President, the temporary ban on short-selling will now end on Wednesday, October 8, not Friday, October 17.  I will leave it to the finance scholars to begin the event studies to see what happened during the ban.  One interesting note, however.  By last week, almost 1000 companies were listed as protected under the SEC's temporary ban.  While speaking at the University of Maryland School of Law's Seventh Annual Business Law Conference (thanks, Lisa!), I wrote down a list of nonfinancial companies that a speaker claimed were on the ban list.  Mark Cicerelli, an investment analyst at a hedge fund, remarked that there was no reason for certain firms to be on the list, including Moddy's, IBM, CVS and Autozone.  Now, whether you think the ban was a stupid idea or just a silly one, it just be somehow related to the credit crisis, so I was curious as to why these companies were on the list.

So, here's the list.  Remember that the SEC did not vet the list much, but instead allowed firms to self-identify as financial firms.  First of all, Autozone isn't on the list.  Autonation is.  I can believe that Autonation's financing arm is a large enough part of its balance sheet as to make the firm as much of a credit company as the other car company on the list (General Motors and Ford Motor Company are also on the list.)  CVS Caremark is on the list, but I'm not sure that this firm is merely a pharmacy.  The company also seems to have clinics and offer prescription management services, so extensions of credit may also be part of its business plan.  I'm sure this is also probably true about IBM.

I'm still stumped as to why Moody's is on the list.  Standard & Poor's is owned by McGraw-Hill, and it's on the list, too.  Thoughts?  I understand that as companies that issued ratings on financial firms and sold their analytical services, their stock prices are in dire danger of going down during this financial crisis.  But I don't think the list was just meant to encompass any firm whose stock is sensitive to the crisis.

Securities | Bookmark

TrackBacks (0)

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8345157d569e20105355558c5970b

Links to weblogs that reference The Short Life of the Short-Selling Ban:

Comments (2)

1. Posted by Paul on October 6, 2008 @ 21:31 | Permalink

CVS is on there because they own some sort of small insurance company that deals with medicare. There's a couple other health insurers on that list for all the same reason, due to the medicare insurance.

Also, the first 799 were created by the SEC. Then they allowed the exchanges to add companies to the list.

Not sure why all the real estate brokers are on the list, I guess they didn't learn to diversify.

Why the list was really created will never be know. It's just one of those things government does to make it seem as if they know what's going on even though they are utterly clueles.


2. Posted by Automotive Parts on June 16, 2011 @ 2:15 | Permalink

It`s really a shocking news.Let`s wait what is gonna happen in future.

Post a comment

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In

Bloggers
Papers
Posts
Recent Comments
Popular Threads
Search The Glom
The Glom on Twitter
Archives by Topic
Archives by Date
April 2014
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30      
Miscellaneous Links