Over at the National Law Journal, I've got a view:
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission's long-awaited rule requiring some users of so-called "conflict minerals" to disclose that use went into effect on June 2. The rule is interesting not because of what it does — it is a modest, targeted effort aimed somewhat indirectly at reducing civil unrest in a part of Africa — but because of what it represents. It allows Congress and financial regulators to strike interesting new poses: one as a protector of human rights, and one as a maker of foreign policy.
If it is meant to end a civil war, it will be unsuccessful. But the rule is still an important new precedent for Congress and its new agent of diplomacy, the SEC.
You can find more here.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Links to weblogs that reference What The Conflict Minerals Rule Means For Congress And The SEC: