April 10, 2005
What I Should Have Submitted to Blawg Review
Posted by Gordon Smith
Kudos to Evan Schaeffer for posting the first installment of the Blawg Review. The past few days have been so crazy that I didn't manage a submission in this inaugural posting, but Conglomerate will be hosting the Blawg Review next month, and we should be a regular participant.
If I had submitted an entry to Blawg Review, it would have been "Contracts and Corporations," where I discuss Nate Oman's new article. If you are interested in contract theory, take a look anyway, as long as you are here.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
https://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8345157d569e200d834584cb269e2
Links to weblogs that reference What I Should Have Submitted to Blawg Review:
ยป High Praise Honorable Mention from
Blawg Review ...
"High praise for our project was given by Professor Ann Althouse, who doesn't like the word "blawg" m ..."
[more]
(Tracked on April 12, 2005 @ 15:00)
Bloggers
Papers
Posts
Recent Comments
Popular Threads
Search The Glom

The Glom on Twitter
Archives by Topic
Archives by Date
Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
Miscellaneous Links
