September 21, 2005
Papal Immunity
Posted by Christine Hurt

Among the many questions asked of John Roberts, "is the Pope immune to lawsuits" was not one of them.  If I were a judge, this would be a question I would prefer not to have in front of me, but it is currently in front of a former fellow BakerBottsian and federal district judge Lee Rosenthal.  Houston Chronicle article here.  Pope Benedict XVI has been named in a lawsuit alleging conspiracy to cover up sexual molestation.  The act in question is a 2001 letter referencing a 1962 policy guideline for addressing sexual molestation complaints.  Judge Rosenthal will have to determine whether the Pope is a head of a church or the head of a state for immunity purposes.  Vatican City was officially recognized by the U.S. in 1984 and the U.S. has an ambassador to the Vatican.  I predict "head of state."

Religion | Bookmark

TrackBacks (1)

TrackBack URL for this entry:
https://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8345157d569e200d834244ddc53ef

Links to weblogs that reference Papal Immunity:

ยป Federal Government: Pope Deserves Immunity from U.S. Liability from A Stitch in Haste ...
"As expected, the federal government has told a Texas court that Pope Benedict XVI is entitled to imm ..." [more] (Tracked on September 21, 2005 @ 10:57)
Bloggers
Papers
Posts
Recent Comments
Popular Threads
Search The Glom
The Glom on Twitter
Archives by Topic
Archives by Date
January 2019
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    
Miscellaneous Links