September 15, 2005
Thank you, sir. May I have another?
Posted by Mike Madison

A brutal but refreshingly blunt description of the article selection "process" at Michigan Law Review, from Letters of Marque:

Consider this: most people who submit to us also submit to the 20 or so journals near us in quality. We are in competition for their work. For a number of good pieces, if we don't get them within a couple of days, we may not get them. (Some other good pieces may languish indefinitely). This means, that if we want to be truly effective, we need to evaluate 40-50 new articles every day. That's 6-7 per article editor.

So what happens?

So we don't read the articles that we get in their entirety. I read abstracts and sometimes the first three pages or so of articles. If I don't find something to like in the first five pages, I usually reject the article. If I don't know what the author's saying within the first five pages, I usually reject the article. If I think that the author is an uninspired writer, I usually reject the article. I hate it.

The whole entry is worth reading.  It responds to, among other things, this post by Paul Gowder.

Law Schools/Lawyering | Bookmark

TrackBacks (0)

TrackBack URL for this entry:

Links to weblogs that reference Thank you, sir. May I have another?:

Comments (0)
Post a comment

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In

Recent Comments
Popular Threads
Search The Glom
The Glom on Twitter
Archives by Topic
Archives by Date
January 2019
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    
Miscellaneous Links