To the extent that global governance can help us out of the recession, it is interesting that it has been the G20 that has been the body tasked to do it - no UN (of course), no OECD, some developing participation, but not too much, no treaty framework, giving the group flexibility ... it very much has a Concert of Europe feel. We told you about their first meeting here - it produced a combination of the somewhat substantive and the diplomatic blatherous. The second meeting comes in April, which is when something serious is supposed to have happened; this weekend, the G20 finance ministers met for a "how'm I doing?" pre-meeting.
The pre-meeting disappointed, and one problem seems to be that Germany reiterated its opposition to a further Keynesian stimulus. Simon Johnson, a fantastic crisis blogger, and big supporter of government intervention in the economy, is driven to inarticulateness about it here. He appears to believe that we are at a high noon, where government breaks the banks or gets broken by them, which is interestingly proto-Marxist, here. And his recommendation?
Oh, only two trillion for stabilization. Prior experience suggests to me that much of this gets given to the banks that Johnson thinks government must destroy. But I may be missing something.
| Bookmark
TrackBack URL for this entry:
https://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8345157d569e20112796b972a28a4
Links to weblogs that reference The G20 Finance Ministerial:

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
