Davod notes Dodd-Frank's "wee bit of federalization" in creating a Federal Insurance Office. Although I'm thankful Congress didn't go further and that some jurisdictional competition was preserved, I agree with Dave that the FIO is a move toward greater coordination. The problem is that without a structure designed to achieve a balance between federalization and constructive competition, I think that state regulation as a whole is likely to "fade away" -- and not just its "idiosyncracies" as Dave suggests.
Henry Butler and I have proposed a system aimed at improving and preserving state competition while addressing its worst flaws. The system allows insurers to choose a single state regulator, but gives states some power to protect local insureds through legislation. A Federal Insurance Office conceivably could be part of this system by providing monitoring and a threat of federal takeover if the states misbehave.
There is still time to go down this road. I hope our proposal gets a full hearing before we jettison the states and end up with another unwieldy federal bureaucracy.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
https://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8345157d569e20133f26b1298970b
Links to weblogs that reference Dodd-Frank forum: the march toward federalization of insurance:

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
