It's not the freshest Supreme Court opinion, but the Mayo Foundation case (on whether medical residents are students exempt from FICA taxes) was a demonstration that the Supreme Court doesn't really like alternatives to Chevron deference for its agencies. There's a nice write-up on the case here. I've argued that Treasury operates differently than other agencies, with less searching (and frequent) judicial review. Mayo Foundation is pretty consistent with that view, though it is a tax law case, and as Kristin Hickman has shown us time and again, tax is just differernt.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
https://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8345157d569e2014e8902a614970d
Links to weblogs that reference Treasury: The Supreme Court Gives It More Deference:
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
| 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
| 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
